|
Glen Echo
uses several techniques to successfully manage the lake. We contract
with Lycott Environmental for
weed management services. Lycott evaluates the lake each spring
and assists us in determining the best course of action for optimum
weed control. We typically rely on three weed control processes.
First, a chemical weed treatment, if needed, occurs mid summer.
Second, a drawdown of anywhere between 0 - 4 feet that would normally
begin around October 1st. And finally, a refill, or closing of the
dam gate, in mid December to mid January. The Drawdown/Refill is
managed by GEIA Dam Monitor, David Sanders, and the town's Dam Monitor
for Glen Echo, Skip Bellerive. Depending on Lycott's study, we may
decide to proceed with some or all of these control measures. Schedules
are set out below.
Biological Survey
There is no biological survey scheduled at this time.
Chemical
Weed Treatment Schedule
2008 Weed Treatment for new weed growth
Lycott will be treating the lake for weed on Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2008
Information per Jackie Nowak, GEIA President: At the August meeting, we discussed the weed growth in the lake. Lycott came out in mid to late July and took a look at a few spots on the lake and indicated that the weed growth we are experiencing is not Milfoil but a proliferation of other "beneficial" weeds. These weeds, if left unchecked, can reach nuisance levels. Glen Echo is under contract with Lycott to treat all weeds so Lycott will be treating the lake AT NO COST to the Association for the weed growth we are now experiencing. To that end, Glen Echo will be treated TUESDAY, 2 SEPTEMBER 08. Signs will be posted around the lake regarding swimming, fishing, irrigation, etc.
2008 Weed Treatment
Lycott will be treating the lake for weeds on Tuesday, 2 Sept 08.
The following restrictions apply:
No swimming or Fishing for 24 hours
No Irrigation until 7 Sept 08
No Drinking until 5 Sept 08
Drawdown/Refill
Schedule
Drawdown to begin October 15, 2008
On 17 September 2008, the Glen Echo Lake Assn went before the Conservation Commission regarding the fall 2008 drawdown. At that time, we were approved for a 4-foot drawdown. The drawdown will start on 15 October 2008. The lake level will be reduced 1-2 inches per day until we have drawn down the lake four feet. We will follow the same "stepped" re-fill procedure as last year.
Refill info as of Feb. 5, 2009
GEIA received notification from Lycott on 17 January 09 to close the gate on the dam and start the refill process. Thanks, Jackie Nowak, President, GEIA
Click
Here to review the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Drawdown
Performance Standards
Water
Quality Testing
Not applicable
at this time.
Order of Conditions
A new Notice
of Intent (NOI) was submitted to the Conservation Commission in
March of 2005 for the continuation of the drawdown and herbicide
treatment for weed control. Lycott Environmental is under contract
to GEIA for the lake's weed control until 2008. A public hearing
was held on March 2, 2005 regarding the NOI. At that time, the Conservation
Commission approved the NOI and GEIA has been issued a new Order
of Conditions to continue with the current weed treatment plan.
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Drawdown Performance Standard
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife
Drawdown Performance Standards for the Protection
of Fish and Wildlife Resources
Approved by the Fisheries and Wildlife Board on September
23, 2002
The Wetlands Protection Act requires that the Division
of Fisheries and Wildlife be notified of any proposed drawdown where
rare species habitat is involved. To identify areas of rare species
habitat, consult the most recent edition of the "Massachusetts Natural
Heritage Atlas" which contains maps of Estimated Habitats and Priority
Habitats of rare wildlife.
Drawdowns are commonly used as a technique to control
aquatic vegetation in many Massachusetts waterbodies. The Division
has statutory authority for regulating the take of these resources
under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 131 and Chapter 321 of the
Code of Massachusetts Regulations. Based on the Division of Fisheries
and Wildlife's knowledge and understanding of aquatic ecosystems,
the following performance standards were developed to protect fish
and wildlife resources when a lake drawdown is proposed.
For drawdowns exceeding 3 feet the Division of Fisheries
and Wildlife must be contacted directly for a site-specific review
of potential impacts to fish and wildlife resources. For drawdowns
of 3 feet or less, the proponent must either 1) contact the Division
of Fisheries and Wildlife for a site-specific review; or 2) meet
the performance standards below:
1. Drawdowns must commence after November 1st.
Drawdowns have been documented to be effective for
vegetation control in certain situations but still constitute an
artificial disturbance. Consequently, any drawdown should take place
for the minimum amount of time required to accomplish the lake-management
goal for which the drawdown is conducted. A November 1st start date
for the drawdown will allow the following conditions to be met:
- The pond can be drained at the appropriate rate.
- Sufficient time will be provided for the drawdown to be effective.
- The pond can be filled prior to the refill deadline.
Maintaining full pool elevation until this date will
also minimize the risk of in-lake and downstream fish kills caused
by temperature stress and low dissolved oxygen. Fish kills that
occur during the warm weather months are often caused by the interaction
between water temperature and oxygen depletion in shallow, heavily
vegetated lakes (Bennett, 1970). These lakes tend to have elevated
oxygen concentrations during the daytime while vegetation is photosynthesizing,
yet experience oxygen depletions at night while live plants are
respiring and large amounts of decaying organic matter create excessive
biological oxygen demand (Wetzel, 1975). Low dissolved oxygen situations
are common in numerous small, shallow lakes in Massachusetts. A
reduction of the surface water elevation under these conditions
could further exacerbate an already critical condition. Temperature-induced
fish kills can also be caused by the release of large volumes of
warm surface water into a coldwater fishery resource during summer
or early fall. One recent example occurred in Coal Mine Brook in
Worcester, resulting in a significant kill of brook trout.
Part of the Division's management responsibilities
is to provide recreational opportunities. Initiating the drawdown
after November 1st will minimize impacts on fall recreation by maintaining
public boat ramp access and other recreational opportunities. Anglers,
seeking to take advantage of stocked trout resources, or warmwater
fish species that become more active in the fall, will launch boats
or fish from shore. Low water levels can expose boat ramps and hinder
safe boat launching. Likewise, exposed mud flats or accumulated
dying vegetation can limit access to shore fishing.
2. The drawdown must be completed (reach its lowest
elevation) by December 1st.
Amphibians, reptiles and other aquatic organisms need
to be able to move to deeper water before ice formation and substrate
freezing. Completion by December 1st will also allow aquatic mammals
to locate alternate lodge sites and for beaver to relocate food
caches before ice formation.
3. Lake refill must be achieved by April 1st.
This refill date will ensure that the resource is
impacted for the shortest time period while still allowing the drawdown
to be effective. Establishing stable pool elevations by April 1st
will provide suitable spawning habitat for littoral spawning fish
species. Also, spring traditionally signals the beginning of the
fishing season for most Massachusetts anglers pursuing both cold
and warmwater fish species. Many ponds are also scheduled for trout
stocking in the early spring. For the same reasons previously described,
access to public boat ramps (for boats and stocking trucks) and
shoreline fishing must be maintained.
4. The drawdown rate must not exceed 4 cubic feet
per second per square mile of drainage area (cfsm), as measured
at the outlet structure, or must not exceed three inches of lake
elevation change per day, whichever results in the lower downstream
flow rate. Once the drawdown level has been achieved, lake outflow
must equal lake inflow. During the lake refill period, 0.5 cfsm
must be maintained at the outflow.
A major biological concern and priority for the Division
is protecting instream flows for fish and wildlife resources. Working
in conjunction with researchers at Cornell University, the Division
is utilizing the target fish community approach to assess stream
fisheries resources and establish restoration goals in flow-stressed
streams. An important component of restoration or maintenance of
any stream fish community is the establishment of seasonal stream
flow requirements. In the absence of site-specific stream flow data,
we utilize the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Aquatic Base
Flow (ABF) Policy to protect fish and wildlife resources.
The ABF Policy focuses on measuring the flows in healthy,
unregulated streams and rivers in New England to determine average
seasonal flows for the region. Seasonal recommendations, from typical
low summer flows to typical spring runoff (referred to as the natural
hydrograph) can then be applied during the appropriate time of year
in regulated resources or in instances where water withdrawal or
manipulation is proposed. The seasonal ABF recommendations are 0.5
cfsm in the summer, 1.0 cfsm in the fall/winter, and 4.0 cfsm in
the spring.
Most drawdowns are conducted during the winter for
vegetation control. This creates flow rates that will be greater
than the winter ABF recommendation during pond drawdown and less
that the winter ABF recommendation during refill. The drawdown rates
listed above, although outside the value for the winter ABF recommendation,
will maintain stream flows within the range that would be expected
in the natural hydrograph.
Providing the flows listed in the performance criteria
will prevent the stream from going dry during pond refill, minimize
downstream erosion and prevent fish stranding in the pond.
References
Bennet, G. W. 1970. Management of lakes and ponds.
Van Nostrand ReinholdCompany, New York, NY.
Wetzel, R. G. 1975. Limnology. W. B. Saunders Company,
Philadelphia, PA. |